Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Marriage and Dating

My mother and father got divorced when I was four. When asked later whether she would remarry, my mother would say “I made that mistake once; I won’t make it again” or something to that effect (a sentiment I have heard from other divorced women of her generation). I don’t know what put her off marriage; she rarely spoke to us about her marriage to my father and she was careful not to speak ill of him. But she never did remarry.

She didn’t swear off men, though. Many, if not most, of her friends were men; I can’t remember any close female friends she had. She also actively dated and had a number of boyfriends. I don’t remember who she dated when I was very young, but I remember her later boyfriends. One of them teased me in a way I found rather demeaning – he made fun of my height and liked to smear my glasses, which annoyed me to no end. Another made passes at me, which while flattering and exciting, was also confusing; it also showed poor judgment on his part and was in bad taste, to say the least. I did like one of her boyfriends, a beefy, good-natured Italian man who used to bring us cannoli. She had rather eclectic taste in boyfriends, as they were fairly disparate in age and varied in both looks and temperament.

She never seemed to lack for boyfriends, so I assume she was popular among men. While her relationships with men were often ongoing, they also seemed less serious as she certainly seemed to make no commitment to any one boyfriend. In fact, at one point, she had two or three boyfriends at the same time. I remember that one of them (Bob) stayed with us for a while when he didn’t have a place to live, and she continued to have one of her other boyfriends sleep over during that time. This resulted in some jealousy and hurt on Bob’s part, which he poured out to me as he taught me guitar. He hoped I would comfort him in his pain, and although I cared for him, I knew this relationship was a bad idea. I don’t think I ever told my mother about the talks Bob and I had or his attempted seduction of me; I don’t know what her reaction would have been. I was relieved when he moved out.

When I was in high school and college, I was intrigued by the notion of group marriages. I had read many of Robert Heinlein’s novels, and his later works offer a vision of a society in which group marriages are the norm (multiple men and women committed to an economic and child-rearing unit, as well as being sexually intimate in various pairings and groupings). He captured a view of sex as recreational fun rather than necessarily deeply emotional, and rejected the need for sexual monogamy as the core of intimate, committed relationships. I found this idea to be compelling, both in its functional ability to provide an extended family network of choice and its vision of sexual agency for men and women. I thought the idea of a group marriage offered a potential solution to the challenge of combining work and child-rearing, as well as providing a broader economic base than the nuclear family. I was also drawn to the ideal of sexual freedom, in which men and women could engage in sexual relationships as they chose without fear, shame, or feelings of jealousy.

In retrospect, I can see that Heinlein’s utopia is built on a traditionally male vision of sexual freedom. The freedom to have casual sex with any and all partners, the cornerstone of the sexual revolution, may have been an androcentric (male-centered) model of sexuality. Not all men and women desire or enjoy casual sex or multiple partners, and sexual jealousy is not so easily conquered for many people. While I still value the vision of sexual freedom, I suspect it needs to be more nuanced and recognize a diversity of human needs, including the desire for intimacy and long-term bonding.

But I think part of the reason that this vision of sexual liberation and alternative family forms was so compelling for me was how it paralleled my mother’s choices. I never made this connection before, but my mother not only rejected marriage as a goal, but also the traditional model of serial monogamy. Rather than having one monogamous relationship at a time, my mother dated who she liked and enjoyed herself without shame. She never tried to hide these relationships from us or from the other men she dated (as far as I know). My mother provided a model of a woman who owned her own sexuality and engaged in relationships on her own terms. That provided one strand of my own emergent feminism, that women are entitled to their own sexual agency, and that they are not possessed by men. Whether they choose to embrace monogamy, polyamory, or celibacy, these must be choices women make for themselves, not at the behest of their partners.

Interestingly, my mother was planning to move in with Bill (one of her long-term boyfriends) after my brother left for college. This seems to reflect a shift from her prior relationship pattern of more casual relationships. I presume that she had become more serious about that relationship and was willing to commit to it more fully. I don’t know what precipitated her decision to move in with Bill – was she just waiting until we were older and she was less responsible for our care? Did her feelings toward Bill deepen? Had he signaled a new willingness to commit to her? I don’t know, but it clearly indicates that she was capable of serious, committed relationships, and that she was able to trust in the future of this relationship. She died before they were to move in together, so I don’t know whether this would have turned out well or poorly. But I hope that it was a decision my mother made on her own terms. And, true to her own adage, she never did talk about marrying him.

Nancy Driessel Stearns (date and location unknown)

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I can't help but wonder about the creepy guys. What would she have done had she known?

When my Mom started dating, she dated some REALLY creepy guys. I am glad it didn't start sooner in my life, as I doubt that my mother would have dealt with it by ousting the boyfriend...

Deborah C. Stearns said...

I wonder what she would have done, too. I'm not sure I would characterize the attempt at seduction as "creepy" -- it certainly seems inappropriate to come onto a 15-year-old, but the practice of men dating younger women and the sexualization of young women/girls is so pervasive in our society that I'm not surprised such things happen. Troubled, but not surprised. Indeed, my unenlightened adolescent self was often flattered (as well as a bit frightened) by the attention of older men (sad, but true). However, coming onto the *daughter* of the woman you are dating does seem like fodder for an episode of Jerry Springer. I'm sorry to hear about your experience with creepy mom-boyfriends -- I like to think that she would have ousted them if she had known.

Anonymous said...

Both as the recipient of such attention in my teens and now as amother, I find it VERY creepy. Not surprising, but it makes my skin crawl nevertheless.

My mother was raised with the belief that men's behavior is caused by women, so I am glad it never got to the point at my house where I couldn't get myself away.

I have to say though, as I remember your mother, she may still have SPOKEN to these men, but I doubt she would have let them back in your house.

Anyway, I'd like to think so...

Anonymous said...

By the way, I love your commentary on Heinlein.

Deborah C. Stearns said...

I'm sorry to hear that your mother was in the woman-blaming mindset. It is all too common. *sigh*

I think you may be right about my mother, in that she was (in some ways) fiercely protective of her children, and I think she would have believed me and not blamed me. I think if I had indicated that the man had made me uncomfortable, she would have respected that and made sure he didn't bother me again. But my feelings regarding Bob were much more complicated -- I was attracted to him and didn't view his behavior as creepy or coercive. I just thought it was a bad idea for us to get involved (for lots of reasons). He didn't like that answer and continued to make his feelings known, but he never pushed the point forcibly. I always felt free to say no, although I knew it would hurt him. So, in that case, I don't know that my mother would have thrown him out -- it depends on how she felt about adolescent-adult relationships and whether the adolescent can give genuine consent in those contexts. It's a tough question -- is it possible for a 16 year old to give genuine, informed consent to a relationship with an adult?

I'm glad you liked the Heinlein analysis! I still like his books, even though I know they have sexist and androcentric elements. Isn't it odd that all the women want to sleep with the main male character and have his baby? Can we say male fantasy? :)

Anonymous said...

It would be interesting if you could ask your mother what she would have done. I know my answer to your question would be "hell no!" but then, if the adult is 18 and in no way in a position of authority - yes, I can see that.

But if this man was more than 10 years older than you, as a parent, I would have issues. There is *usually* an absolute chasm between what matters to a teen-ager and a person in their mid-20s or 30s. And well, if there isn't, I would think something wasn't right there...

As to the Heinlein, I'd love to have that discussion one day, though I am in full agreement with you. I know I always felt like I was getting away with something reading him. Mom would have had my HIDE if she'd had any idea is wasn't all space-ships and alien adventure.